IKRAM-UD-DIN versus GHULAM AHMAD KHAN
Section 13 Convention evidence (10 of 1984), Articles 3 and 17 were sent to the shopkeepers in accordance with the provisions of Section 13 (3), Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, in which two witnesses related to the student identity were not confirmed, Such witnesses tried to prove a pre-emptor's request for a sale in connection with his knowledge of the pre-emptor had accepted the exact knowledge of the sale on September 1, 1991, when he applied for a copy of the sales dead witnesses. Applied, however, he supported the misrepresentation prematurely that he found out about the sale. Apart from the transaction on September 28, 1991, such witnesses contradicted themselves in material details; the witnesses were in question; therefore, they were not true witnesses and their evidence in connection with the making of the Tolbs could not be relied upon.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Khanqah Dogran lawyer
