Find a Lawyer

ZAHID FAROOQ versus ANJUMAN JAMIA MASJID

The buyer of the Mohammedan non-dedicated review of the plot made the same purchase for the mosque. He told the authorities at the time of the auction of the said plot and the fact that the plot was purchased for mosque purposes and this fact was clearly included in the auction transfer process. The persons and related sales work acknowledged that he had purchased the said plot for the mosque, and not only that the sale work in favor of the individuals was clearly stated in the sale of the plot, The seller was not working as its owner but organized by the mosque, there was no clear evidence of a permanent deduction of the plot for the mosque and the plot was dedicated property.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 1995

• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, B.O.R., HAZARA DIVISION, ABBOTTABAD 1995 SCMR 1557
• ABDUL GHAFOOR v. MUHAMMAD FAZIL 1995 SCMR 1561
• FARHAT ALI KHAN v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE, ADVOCATE 1995 SCMR 1570
• MUHAMMAD SHAFT v. ALI NAWAZ KHAN 1995 SCMR 1577
• CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION, ISLAMABAD v. NASIR AHMAD 1995 SCMR 1593
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. STATE 1995 SCMR 1613
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. STATE 1995 SCMR 1615
• KHUDA BAKHSH v. STATE 1995 SCMR 1621

All Supreme Court judgments of 1995 →

famous supreme court advocate from Daska lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes