Find a Lawyer

ILAM DIN versus RUQIYA BEGUM

Pakistan (Administration for Evacuation Property) Act 1957 Section 3 [as adopted in Azad Jammu and Kashmir] Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Allotment In the allotment of land in the questions affecting accuracy, the appellate allotment made in 1982 by the High Court in favor of the appellant was volatile for such property as the property of eviction before 1951 Was not done, and as such, it cannot be done after that. Such a point was raised by the defendant in the constitutional petition; the High Court canceled the allotment on the basis that the above was the point raised in such petition. I ordered Without satisfactory explanation of the applicant's delay in filing the constitutional petition and allotment of the petition, ignoring the law, the Appellant NG Party filed a petition filed by the Appellant in 1981 before the Custodian. The question, whether the property was vacated or not, was restrained by the principles of Race Judasta and not about the High Court or any other authority. The property was not vacated and the appellant's allotment was to be declared illegal. In addition, the question is whether the property in question is considered vacant or there is not a mixed question of law or fact only in exceptional circumstances. Can only be resolved in the exercise of the constitutional jurisdiction and, in the case of opportunity, in favor of law websites from Pannu aqil lawyer