MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
Special accused in the notification of the Constitution Petition issued by the Federal Government under Section 5 (2) of the Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Act. Mentioning crimes against them has been termed serious, brutal. And the sensational and no material in the case was kept on record to indicate whether the transfer of the case was made in the public interest or not. What was and what can be concluded in the absence of any material? The composition of the opinion was arbitrary or contradictory; the presumption of regularity was related to the order that powers were exercised under section 5 of the law, the assignment of the case to the special court was also registered under section 5 (1) of the Act Was. It did not show that the challan was submitted before the competent court's constitutional petition was rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Mustang lawyer
