Find a Lawyer

BABOO DIN versus NASROO

Sections 2 (f) (j) and 15 (2) (ii) default tenant in the payment of tenancy in connection with the payment of the rent paid and the monthly rent payment of the house to the landlord was continued. , But he later denied the relationship between the landlord and the tenant. The parties alleged that the landlord had contracted for the sale of the property in his favor and had not paid the rent thereafter who had acquired the house on the rent and then on the basis of the alleged sale agreement. An honor was established in connection with the premises, it was prevented from being challenged. The landlord's title, and especially when he failed to establish his title, did not deserve any concession that initially paid the landlord rent but then the landlord had to pay a rent. Or had failed to pay the tender, he had declared himself responsible for eviction. Wolf Defaulter

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 1995

• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 1446
• ABDUL RAZZAK v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 1995 CLC 1453
• AL-RUKIYA TRADERS v. CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 1995 CLC 1456
• HASSANALLY v. NOOR MUHAMMAD 1995 MLD 1458
• PREMIER TOBACCO INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, TRADE MARKS REGISTRY 1995 MLD 1464
• AMTUL HASEEB v. JAMIL AUTOS, PROPRIETOR, S. BARTAR HUSSAIN NAQVI 1995 MLD 1467
• MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE v. AZIZUDDIN 1995 MLD 1471
• KHALID MANSOOR v. AZHAR BAQAI 1995 MLD 1476

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 1995 →

immigration advocates email from Rajana lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes