Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

JAMIA MAHMOODIA MASJID versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), MULTAN DIVISION


Law Evidence Order 1984 Article 30 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Impact of admission in judicial proceedings The effect of defendant's admission is that he was a tenant of the appellant High Court because such admission was complete. ? Before the High Court took no exception to his admission, neither refused nor sought to explain it, the finding filed by the High Court regarding such admission was considered proportional. Yes, so there was a false disclosure and an error effect respondent incorrectly answered in his request. The special jurisdiction tribunals were neither on a valid basis nor in any justification, especially when such factual finding was supported by oral and documentary evidence when the High Court decision on record was set aside and the circumstances. The orders of the tribunals were restored.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.