ABDUL MAJID versus ABDUL SATTAR
Section 302/148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 439 was the real brother of the deceased, who complainant reached the house of his deceased brother immediately after the incident, the daughter of the victim who witnessed the incident. , She would immediately tell her uncle about the names of the suspects she already knew and in this case the complainant would have mentioned the names of the particular accused: v, the real attacker , But the complainant's report was registered against the unknown assailants. Eti, who had entered into a marriage contract with the complainant's son, stated in effect the complainant who himself was suspected in the case under which the trial was inspected. The acquittal of the accused and the mere fact that a second theory of evidence was possible was not enough to justify the intervention of the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Phagwar lawyer