Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QADIR HASHIM versus PRINCIPAL, BOLAN MEDICAL COLLEGE,QUETTA

Violation of constitutional provisions of Section 33 Prospectus, Articles 67 and 69 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 25 of the Bolan Medical College Quetta for Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance 1962, 1992, 1992 and 1992 93, RR The provisions contained in 67, 69 of the Bolan Medical College prospectus, are refusing to advance to the next upper class until the students lose their seats in the applicant medical college, clearing all their subjects in four pursuit or non-profit possibilities. I lost my seat in certain occasions. In Prospect KR used to justify the provision of Prospect Term KR of 69, its general significance would be due to its necessity, the court would generally interpret the term in this sense when Unless such an interpretation would lead to nothing. Make a ridiculous or hurtful result or conflict with the intention of the legislature (including the Legislature) to submit. Applicable Enforcement, Regulation or other section of Bye-laws / Rules made thereunder, were construed in accordance with the directions of Rules 67 and 69 of the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council, which is a legal institution under which The federal government has formed. In the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962, it was mandatory for all medical colleges and universities to adhere to all such rules / regulations in order to achieve the minimum basic standards set by the Council Prosecution of Bolan Medical College. Behind this, the legal sanctity / regulations / rules imposed by the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council and the rules made under it are illegal. family advocate from Narang Mandi lawyer