Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and the receipt of the dower suit for the plaintiff's wife claimed against the plaintiff's husband that the disputed articles had been given to him by his parents and the defendant had deposed those articles. Threw her out of her home and later divorced the claim of the plaintiff's wife, which was supported by the witnesses who named the articles and also took advantage of their significance and stated that the plaintiff had The plaintiff was divorced and the contentious controversial articles were not returned to her. Nevertheless, the plaintiff's wife had demanded that the credibility of the witnesses in this regard had not been erased, under which she was targeted, but the trial court simply denied her because she was the plaintiff's wife. Has close relatives and did not buy articles in it. Ask yourself questions that do not constitute a valid basis for discrediting witnesses whose testimony affects trustworthiness, otherwise close relatives were excellent witnesses to explain what articles the plaintiff's wife provided on a daily basis. Since the witnesses did not buy the articles in question, would they show that they were not witnesses to the articles delivered to the plaintiff's wife at the time of marriage? The plaintiff is already divorced from his wife and has nothing on record to prove to him that she has received any benefits during the marriage, given to his parents at the time of marriage. It would be cruel to refute an article that was gone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
