Find a Lawyer

REHMAT NOOR versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD

The effect of non-compliance with the required components of the Mohammedan Law Gift Accessory Gift was neglected by the inheritance change of the gift, which was much earlier than the stipulated time on which the defendants claimed that the deceased had acquired the gift land. The gift was obtained in the 7 7 1969 (after the death of the alleged donor) which the plaintiff claimed he had given to the land in the first week of July (when he had previously given it). The fact of possession was not proven, nor was it proved that they were moved. The gift could only be effective when the gift The facts of the declaration; the transfer of the possession together with the acceptance of the gift also proved that the oral evidence in the evidence of the alleged gift was full of contradictions that could not be relied upon by the plaintiff in the case legally entitled to inheritance in their favor. Was filed for deprivation. On the question of facts, there can be no legal finding and prohibition on the harmony of the courts under which the plaintiffs claim that the gift has been neglected and there is no guarantee of interference in the circumstances. best advocate from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer