Find a Lawyer

FIRDOUS versus MUHAMMAD RAFI

Sindh Tenant Premise Ordinance 1979 Section 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 114 and AXLVI, R1 Review Appeal Review of Appellant's Appeal on Payment of Specific Expenses by the High Court Was reinstated against the imposition of costs at the request of. The order sanctioned under section 21 was not capable of reviewing the Sindh Rated Premise Ordinance because the provisions of the CPC Ordinance provisions relating to the review did not indicate that it was related to the review.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 1995

• BARKAT ALI v. FATIMA BAI 1995 CLC 1012
• WAPDA v. ABDUL AZIZ 1995 PCRLJ 1012
• GHULAM RASOOL KHAN v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 1995 CLC 1021
• COTTON EXPORT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. ASIF COTTON GINNERS 1995 CLC 1024
• CHARTERED BANK v. SHIRIN BAI Y. SAJJAN 1995 MLD 1054
• MUHARRAM ALI SANJRANAI v. SPACE AND UPPER ATMOSPHERE RESEARCH COMMISSION 1995 PLC(CS) 1057
• ABDUL KARIM v. MUHAMMAD SABIR 1995 CLC 1080
• M/S. NADIA GHEE MILL (PVT.) LIMITED v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS 1995 PTD 1092

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 1995 →

top advocate from Ugoki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes