The appearance of the CPC and the non-submission of the Civil Procedure Code Order IX failed to appear on the postponement date of the hearing while attacking the defendant O IX, R 12, the court terminated its defense and the plaintiff's arguments After hearing the court's order dismissing the case, the court clearly showed that the plaintiff was given almost two years to include his evidence. On the first occasion the court granted his evidence Decided to invade defendant's defense within a month and did not approve any order for the previous action order. Defendant's defense evidence in the court was not sustainable
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
