TAJ MUHAMMAD versus AYUB
The plaintiff's witness, in his evidence, sought the termination of the Section 13 lawsuit under the NWFP Pre-Emission Act 1987, in his evidence that he had told the plaintiff about the sale of the property and that he had sent the jurisdiction of Patambari to Patwari. Issued a bullying on this case on 21 5 1990, when the exchange was approved, the sale of the matter took place on 10 10 on 1989, when the plaintiff admitted that the student was tortured on 17 August 1990. Was made on 26 8 1990, the plaintiff made the petition invalid for 2 months after the date of his knowledge and 10 months after the sale transaction. B after further maauyst and tlh aysad term, truth stands out the plaintiff's favor, in order to empty before in such circumstances was not entitled to Kill
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Shamsabad lawyer
