CANTONMENT BOARD, RAWALPINDI versus MUHAMMAD SAEED
Without the approval of the Cantonment Board suit for the permanent relief of defendants, sections 42 and 54 of the Cantonment Act 1924, section 273 and 54, it was considered by the Cantonment Board that the construction of a multi-storied building Virtual Approval of the suit has been granted under section 27373 of the Act, even though it was not required to be given to the Cantonment Board prior to the filing of the deemed deed received and this right is required to be filed by the plaintiffs. In fact, there was a lawsuit for the defendant to declare his acquisition of the rights under the right clause. Claims to be made even though it was deemed factual as a permanent injunction claim and they had to send a notice to the Cantonment Board under section 273, the Cantonment Act, 1924, which they did not discuss, in such circumstances. was not
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
