Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NIAZ AHMED versus SHAMS-UD-DIN


In the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Court Fees Act (VIIl of 1870), the appeal filed before the Section 7 Appeal Court was accepted by the Appellate Court against the decision of the trial court on oath, although on appeal's memorandum The required court fee was not paid. After accepting the appeal, the trial court moves the trial court in that direction to try all the cases that were challenged by the appellate court's order that the appeal be filed without paying the appropriate court fees. No, and this is an appeals court hearing. The merit is not directed to the trial decision. The respondent agreed to pay the required court fees and further agreed that the constitutional petition is dealt with in the case that the order passed by the appellate court was amended. And the case will be left open for the trial court to decide. According to the law, the complainant agreed with the terms of the offer, the court ordered accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Harnai lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.