Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Section 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), revised prosecution against section 439, was barred by two witnesses, resulting in the inevitable cause of their being presented as prosecution. Did not support, Ocular evidence was in direct confrontation The presence of witnesses on the occasion of presence of medical evidence was suspicious The motive was not disclosed No respected person in the eligible area was not involved in the recovery proceedings trial court. The decision was not serious and could not be interfered with. If a different view was possible then the amendment petition was excluded according to Taj Muhammad Khan Langah for the applicant. immigration advocates phone number from Garh Maharaja lawyer