MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus RENT CONTROLLER/CIVIL JUDGE 1ST CLASS, SADIQABAD
West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OI, R 10 Applicability to be applied as a party to the removal request In the petitioner's request that he was a co-owner of the property. Questioned, his lawyer was rejected, under which he confessed that he was no longer reluctant after the decision of the division case had been reached and that he had attained final status. Further claims that the upper part should have been enforced once it was occupied. It also had no effect, where a tenant brought in a third person to distribute the premises, the third person's position was merely an interventionist to defend the tenant's petition for the petitioner's removal. There was no locus standi, however, nor did he claim to be a sub-tenant, nor did he accept any rights which justified its enforcement as a party to the removal request. Should
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
