MUAMBER versus ASSISTANT POLITICAL AGENT
Tribunals constituted under section 5 of section 302 of the Provincial Administered Tribal Areas Criminal Law (Special Provisions) Rule (I of 1975), Provincial Administrative Tribal Areas Criminal Law (Special Provisions) Rules, 1975, 1975 Operations of Sections 9 and 5 before. Two members of the tribunal found the accused innocent, while the remaining two members, based on the statements of two witnesses of the police and magistrate during the investigation in the absence of the accused, were convicted and other sources also said in secret inquiry. The members of the tribunal did not record their evidence. In the presence of the accused, the two witnesses themselves did not provide evidence that they had any opportunity to investigate these witnesses during the interrogation or trial. Was not, the members of the tribunal were not authorized under the law so confidential Information may be collected on inquiry or on the basis of information d. Depending on the statements of witnesses who were neither recorded by the tribunal nor accused of being convicted, they face scrutiny. , Two members of the tribunal, were convicted and sentenced to power over Nali Rai. The prisoner acted illegally, not only declaring his opinion illegal, but his sentence was also recorded by the deputy commissioner with a majority of three-fifths.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Mithi lawyer