Find a Lawyer

ASSISTANT COLLECTOR CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) COLLECTORATE OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, QUETTA versus S.H.O., SARIAB POLICE STATION

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Two agencies, namely the Customs Provenito staff and the district administration, charge serious allegations against each other, which is reflected in their petitions. Are trying to improve the customs' precious lives. Saipai was lost in the fight and counter cases were filed against each agency personnel, the High Court hated the conduct of both agencies and expressed their approval to both agencies, copies of decisions to the Secretary of Interior Division. Sent. The Chief Secretary and Chairman of the province should immediately take necessary steps to bring such officials of the government into the four corners of the law in their own jurisdiction in each agency's relevant boundaries. And the jurisdiction should be explained.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 1995

• MUHAMMAD RAEESE (AZAM) v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN 1995 PLC(CS) 151
• MUHAMMAD RASHEED v. CHAIRMAN BALOCHISTAN LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 1995 PLC 242
• SANAULLAH KHAN v. PROVINCE OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY,FINANCE DEPARTMENT, QUETTA 1995 PTD 350
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN 1995 PLC(CS) 567
• MASOOD AHMED v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN LIVESTOCK DEPARTMENT 1995 PLC(CS) 586
• SEMCO SALVAGE PTE LIMITED v. KAPTAN YUSUF KALKAVAN TURKISH 1995 MLD 706
• NAZAK MIR v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 724
• MST. AAMNA BIBI v. KASHIF-UR-REHMAN 1995 PCRLJ 730

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 1995 →

advocate for immigration from Naukundi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes