ABDUL RASHID, CHIEF ENGINEER, PLANNING, DIRECTOR-GENERAL OFFICE, P.W.D. ISLAMABAD versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) promoted a civil servant cadre civil servant to Grade 19 before respondents who belonged to the E&M cadre in the same department, however, in the seniority list , The defendant was placed senior to the civil servant, both the public servant and the defendant were promoted to grade 20, the same day the public servant appealed against the defendant's publicity and against the seniority list, which showed the defendant as a junior. Was confirmed. The conduct of this question involved the fitness of a person to be promoted to a higher position and, therefore, the matter was beyond its jurisdiction. He preferred the judicial appeal to which he was entitled. Long before the service tribunal, a long-time public servant taken by the department authority in deciding his disposition and appealing, claimed that he was appealing against the original order or was in favor of the state authority The order of appeal on the employee's features claims that he was selected for promotion and in fact had been promoted to Grade 19 before. The respondent and therefore the plaintiff are entitled to be made senior so that the seniority of civil and E&M engineers could be kept (separately) up to the level of Superintendent Engineers (Grade 19) / Appeal leave questions. Was allowed to consider by a civil servant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Doaaba lawyer