MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ SHARIF versus MUHAMMAD ALTAF HUSSAIN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 260, 240, 101 (2) and 199 Constitutional Appeal The appointment of the respondent as the Governor was primarily challenged by the review of the appointment of the former governor to the same position within two years. During my stay in Pakistan, the respondents did not have the right to be re-appointed to the Governor's Office of Governor, whether they were the holder of the Constitutional Office as the Governor of Pakistan from the service of Pakistan. Considered differently, it is treated differently by the Constitution itself. On the plane and at a different level, the holding of Article 260 of the Constitution only on the basis of the clause that those with constitutional offices were also present in the service of Pakistan would be itself a violation of the Constitution while the Governor. While serving in the constitutional office, he was not in the service of Pakistan and was not disqualified from serving as governor again in his term of service to explain his distinction between the constitutional office and the office of Pakistan. Of two signs [words and phrases]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
