Two successive cases were filed by the plaintiff against the plaintiff, after which the provisions of O II, R2 and Section 11, CPC were banned: the first case was for permanent injunction. On the basis of the misconduct on which the plaintiff asserted that he could be forcibly expelled by the defendant because he had previously been expelled from the adjoining store, thus not belonging to the shop. While the second shop case was not prohibited under the provisions. A. II, R2 and Section 11, CPC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
