The West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13, the investigating officer appreciating the evidence, who knew before conducting a raid on the house of the accused (the accused) for his arrest, was the complainant and a witness in the case and hence his So it was important. To provide a plausible explanation of how to relinquish its ability to seek respectable persons in the absence of a search and recovery area where the possibility of falsely implicated in this case cannot be excluded. Defensive evidence was free and reliable. In this case, there was nothing to be investigated but in the absence of expert opinion, the weapons recovered from the accused could not be construed as legal because the prosecution, automatic or semi-automatic weapons. The jurisdiction of the party. The special court will try to make the case suspicious and the trial will fail. The suspect has been rescued in a vinegar
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
