Find a Lawyer

HUSSAIN KHAN & SONS versus IBRAHIMJI SULEMANJEE MITHAIWALA

Sindh Tenant Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 2 (f) (j) and 15 (2) (iii) Relationship of the landlord and tenant premises by the original tenant who was a private trust in question by the trustee and his supervisor Was rented. The tenant bad tenant admitted the same tenant to the subordinate tenancy, but claimed that he too was with the permission of the trustee and the trust premises. All the tenants had been paying the tenant regular rent for three years and in addition to the rent they paid the rent of the place to the tenant. During this period the trustee / original landlord did not contact the sub-tenant to pay the rent or claim to be the landlord. All the tenants asked the trustee to disclose its title documents to ascertain whether the trustee was actually the owner of the house, when all tenants had to submit three years of silence to the court While filing rentals in the off-trustee, refusing to disclose title documents to the sub-tenant, the aiding factor in the belief was that the tenant on the tenant who had rented it from him was a dual landlord trustee who had been silent for three years. Authorize and complete its premises, refusing to show title documents to all tenants on demand Had objected to At this stage he could not exercise his right to demand eviction because of the subletting / trustworthy landlord, his conduct was also responsible for the sub-tenant's belief that the landlord and the tenant were in fact Relationship of, under the circumstances, free entry to entry by the tenant and the original landlord pakistani advocates Panjgur lawyer