UMAR HAYAT versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN
Section 164 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, on the contention, was granted a three-month and five-day appeal before the Commissioner, and for that reason he was properly rejected because the time-limit collector had passed the law. And judging by the rules, the variation in questions was rightly decided. The request for review on the commissioner's articles was endorsed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Shikarpur lawyer