Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SANATA KHAN versus AHMAD


Limitation Act 1908 Arts 142 and 144 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 suit was filed by the petitioners and the defendants for the declaration of ownership based on the prescription title on the land and in question They were both a combination of stability. After the recording of the evidence was dismissed and such findings were affirmed by the appellate court. The applicants claimed that they belonged to this property and that the respondent was unable to show their right to stay, their case had to be canceled which showed that the relevant statements were given false information. The applicants were required to own the land under the decree of the courts and the courts, and the applicants were given a decision according to the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Multan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.