SANATA KHAN versus AHMAD
Limitation Act 1908 Arts 142 and 144 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 suit was filed by the petitioners and the defendants for the declaration of ownership based on the prescription title on the land and in question They were both a combination of stability. After the recording of the evidence was dismissed and such findings were affirmed by the appellate court. The applicants claimed that they belonged to this property and that the respondent was unable to show their right to stay, their case had to be canceled which showed that the relevant statements were given false information. The applicants were required to own the land under the decree of the courts and the courts, and the applicants were given a decision according to the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Multan lawyer