Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus SATTAR BIBI

Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 39 and 42 of the Limitation Act (IX of section 1881, Articles 18 and Arts 91 and 92, except for the filing of a document revocation case which deals with the cancellation of the Power of Attorney and the Sale of Deeds, respectively 23 12 Was written on 1978 and 9. The 1982 defendant himself admitted that he had known about the sale process in question 10/12 years ago, and his witness also testified that he was underground, The possession was where the defendant took possession 10/10 years ago, the basis of the registered sale deed and the fact that he had told the plaintiff the facts of changing his hand, that the plaintiff had, in this way, been sued by his lawyer. Immediately after the plaintiff's registration, she confessed that she had referred to the Revenue Authorities and that she had been found hanged by her (who was her nephew and son) law. Three cases were also filed which were dismissed for illegal prosecution. Section 18, Demanding the cancellation of a document amended by the Limitation Act plaintiff, shall be subject to Article 92 and shall not contain Article 91 of the Limitation Act 1908, for which, after the expiry of the case of the plaintiff The lawsuit was filed after a long time. The three-year legal period was banned from time to time and thus the score could not be sustained. best law firm from Khandabad lawyer