Find a Lawyer

NAEEM TRADERS versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

Section 196, 194C, 3A & 4 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 185 (3) Before the tax reference, the High Court obtained the remand for judgment and judgment and the High Court reversed the provisions of Articles 194C, 3A and 4 of the Customs Act 1969. Was misunderstood. Did the controversial High Court decision affect the provisions of the law, and could it be turned into an amusement and a writ petition even if a question was raised about the law in reference?

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2013

• ASGHAR ABBAS GARDEZI v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 1787
• SURRIDGE AND BEECHENO v. M.T. EASTERN NAVIGATOR 2013 CLD 1815
• ASGHAR ABBAS GARDEZI v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 SCMR 1872
• HAMID MIR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 SCMR 1880
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM, EX-DEPUTY DIRECTOR (AUDIT) DISTRICT GOVT. LAHORE REGION, LAHORE v. AUDITOR-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2013 SCMR 1904
• NAEEM TRADERS v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS 2013 PTD 1952
• Z&J HYGIENIC PRODUCTS (PVT.) LTD. v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, SALES TAX GUJRANWALA 2013 PTD 2022
• Syed MEHMOOD AKHTAR NAQVI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 SCMR 1

All Supreme Court judgments of 2013 →

criminal advocate from Killa Saifullah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes