Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus CHAIRMAN, SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KARACHI


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25A National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Service Rules, 1973 National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Service Rules, 1980 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of Bank Termination The Labor Court ruled that the employee holding the charge sheet against him was ordered to be reinstated due to the employee's dissatisfaction with the job, but the appeal against the bank's order was dismissed by the Labor Appellate Tribunal on the ground that the bank An inquiry proceeding was initiated against the employee under the National Bank of India. Pakistan (Staff) Service Rules 1980 which was not valid and operative and in fact such inquiry should have been made under the National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Service Rules 1973, the constitutional petition of the bank was also dismissed which appealed. The leave was granted considering the dispute that the bank (staff) service rolls of 1973 and 1980 were virtually identical and mentioned only the bank (staff) service rolls. During the 1980s, employees Without prejudice to any kind, the investigation cannot be considered to have failed. There was no connection to the dispute, and his dismissal did not lead to such a dispute. It was not included in the definition of the worker provided in section 2 (xxviii), the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, and The complaint was not filed under section 25A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, which required further consideration that there was sufficient material in the record, which was ignored by the courts below.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Karachi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.