M. SHAHID SAIGOL versus KOHINOOR MILLS LTD.
Against the Minors of Civil Procedure Code Order XXXII and the Indemnified Mind Persons, XXXRI, Rr 1 & 2 Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984; Sections 161 (8) 208, 217 and 290 of Sections 161 (8), 208) , Complaint Ordinance, 2 1 7 of 1984 and 290 filed by the minor under the written authority of the next friend of the minor who was his father, tiled under the authority of his father, who was his natural guardian. Were, in compliance with the provisions of the XXXXXI, the CPC was made that there is no need to appoint a next friend to file the petition, the court is required to file the petition by the applicant. No blood because the next friend will continue to be considered his next friend during the proceedings unless it is clearly shown that he has been disqualified for such action because of his The interest conflicts with the interests of the minor guardian, while at the defendant's level it was determined by the court itself.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kunjah lawyer