Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

TAHIRA DILAWAR versus GHULAM SAMDANI


Sections 218 and 218/109 law apply for leave to appeal against evidence (Article 10 of 1984), Article 102 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), nor original counsel, subject to accusation, alleged Neither the accused nor his copy was produced in court, nor were the circumstances available to justify the secondary evidence required under Article 76 of the Convention evidence 1984, otherwise the relevant Used his conscience mind on the evidence and offered reasons for not relying on the prosecutor's evidence and his decision acquitted the accused and faced any compulsion. Did not have to, but there was no compelling reason to take advantage of the double exploitation of the innocence they had acquired through the court of competent style. The leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Head Marala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.