TAHIRA DILAWAR versus GHULAM SAMDANI
Sections 218 and 218/109 law apply for leave to appeal against evidence (Article 10 of 1984), Article 102 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), nor original counsel, subject to accusation, alleged Neither the accused nor his copy was produced in court, nor were the circumstances available to justify the secondary evidence required under Article 76 of the Convention evidence 1984, otherwise the relevant Used his conscience mind on the evidence and offered reasons for not relying on the prosecutor's evidence and his decision acquitted the accused and faced any compulsion. Did not have to, but there was no compelling reason to take advantage of the double exploitation of the innocence they had acquired through the court of competent style. The leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Head Marala lawyer