MUHAMMAD QASIM versus MOUJUDDIN
O XLI, Rr 17 and 19 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 181 and 168 on the date that the appeal for illegal proceedings should have been dismissed by the court reader and not by the presiding officer. The order for a restriction on the application for readmission was invalid, the appropriate remedy was under Article 181 and the application for re-entry of the appeal under Article 168, Limitation Act 1908, could not be considered a time-barred article. 181 was introduced in the court within the limits set by the Limitation Act, 1908. A case remand was obtained for re-hearing of the appeal on merit
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Neelam lawyer
