Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN POST OFFICES versus NADEEM AHMED KHAN

Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 Section 2 (n) and Schedule II, Item (xiii) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Sections 1 (1) (b) and 2 (1) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Sec. 1 (3) and 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (I68 of I68), Section 1 (4), Regulations of Government Employees (Talent and Discipline), 1973, 4, 5 and 6 Employee Employee MailPone Com Postman as the department such employee whether a man is a postal worker or a government employee of the Department of Labor, who is employed with the foreign duty, Schedule II, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 Was included under item (xiii) and , The worker as defined by section 2 (n) of the Act, by the definition of a public servant given under section 1 (1) (b) and section 2 (1), the Civil Servants Act, 1973. Will be removed. , 1973 as well as the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973 were not included in the provisions of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, under section 1 (4). I'm open to such employee, manual and knowledgeable workforce as Open Mail. Become a legal corporation and after any legal rules were enacted, the employee operated under the provision of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, therefore, the Labor Court's jurisdiction under Section 25A, Industrial Relations Ordinance. With the exception of 1969 to resolve your complaint advocates from Choppar Hatta lawyer