PUNJAB PROVINCE versus MUHAMMAD YAR
Limitation Act 1908 Arts 142 and 144 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The plaintiff's case for possession of the land, was decided by all the courts, including the petition of the High Court. As the Revenue Record was with the provincial government (the defendant was in negative possession) the suit could not be issued. Such competence was not based on merit. All the courts have found that the defendant has no question of the land in question. No title and possession of it was illegal No material was brought to the record on the basis of which a negative possession request can be successful Nothing was brought on record to indicate that the plaintiff's knowledge The plaintiff of which date or year has claimed that the provincial government does not have the ability to seize anyone's property by limiting its citizenship The leave to appeal the injunction was denied in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Choppar Hatta lawyer
