Find a Lawyer

GHULAM FARID versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Government Land (Punjab) Act 1912 Act 1912 Section 10 (4) Land Reform Regulation, 1972 [MLR 1151, para 25 vendors were allotted the same date on the specified date of state land allotment and on the same day In order to justify the land the plaintiff sold the land to the plaintiff that he was the tenant in possession of the land, which was granted by the Assistant Commissioner but his case was filed by the Additional Commissioner and the Board of Revenue's Disciplinary Clause 10. (4). , The Colonization Act of Government Land (Punjab), 1912, has a detrimental effect on the plaintiff's prior authorization, which provides that no person shall be considered a tenant or as long as he is in writing No allotment or title shall be granted to the allotted land. The purpose was approved and he had acquired the land with the permission of the collector, never a tenant under the government. No order was ever granted by the Collector to create any right for the plaintiff, nor did he come into the possession of the land which he had acquired; Was not recognized by the law nor allowed by the government against the section 10 (4), the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act, 1912 as the plaintiff's land and therefore, any Could not get tenancy money in this case. pakistani advocates Chunian lawyer