MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus HASRAT ALI
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, was prepared after the final report was dismissed in the case and the challan has also been completed, three versions of the prosecution's story were presented and Each one of them was primarily different from the other. Such circumstances had contributed to the uncertainty in this case and it was difficult to say which of the others should be chosen, especially when three different Prescriptions came from investigative agencies that had been assigned more time to investigate. Periodically in order to cancel the bail application filed by the complainant, the Speaking Order was rejected by the court below which neither refused nor rejected the petition to cancel the bail granted by the court. The reverse order cannot be interfered with.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Sagri lawyer
