SABEEL AHMAD versus GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P.
NWFP Public Property (Termination of Extensions) Act 1977 Section 3 Property Vacation In the Vacation Dispute of Property, which was originally designated as a "Landowner" in the Municipal Committee, the Municipal Committee completed As authorized, under the work registered with the seller. The sale went to his daughter and then to the occupants who had been in possession for the last seventeen years. The Assistant Commissioner issued notices to the occupants, saying that they should vacate the properties that were allegedly in their unauthorized possession even though the transaction was more in favor of the occupier. More than seventy years old and he himself was disputed with the original seller of the property whose original dispute was in the municipal committee, which had become the "mainland" registered, rightfully transferred in favor of the shopkeepers through the registered process and The occupants who were the legitimate emigrants were actually able to occupy the open land from the last seven years, which was not a land at that time because it had long been in the form of a built property, and it was the occupants themselves. There is ample evidence of the title because of the ancient cause of the time in the dispute all the vendors of the property who were permanently in physical possession. Strengthen. Similarly, for seventy years, after it was built and run its business, the unauthorized occupants issued by the Assistant Commissioner to the applicants / occupiers under Section 3 of the North West Frontier Public Property Act 1977 The notes cannot be declared. Banned
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Babri Banda lawyer