Find a Lawyer

SARDARO ALIAS SARDAR KHAN versus STATE

Section 2302/34 34 The eyewitnesses who were highly interested in the Ocular Account reviewing the evidence did not confirm the enmity with the accused; Had made no attempt in the meantime. The evidence either for recording his statements or for presenting at the trial was not relied upon properly by the trial court evidence against the accused on the evidence of his recovery and the ballistic expert's report. The present accused was acquitted. In practice the same charges which were in the circumstances were not entitled as a matter of grace but as a matter of right, and accordingly he was acquitted. advocate from Choppar Hatta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes