NASEER-UD-DIN versus MASOOD HASSAN
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 24 Appeal Court Exchanges Earlier when the trial court had recorded the evidence of some witnesses and it was the basis for the transfer of appeals which was now hearing before the appellate court's presiding officer. Although Suetz did not record his observations on the conduct of witnesses or did not approve any order affecting the parties' material suits or credibility of the witnesses examined by him, he did see the witnesses. And recorded their evidence, therefore, at the trial phase of the suit relating to its contents, they may not be disputed or the past hearing of the trial officer's past companion should be referred to the court. Appeals arising from decisions need to be withheld. The remote possibility of prejudice, favoritism or unfair treatment, even if the judge is sitting in it, will affect the judge's running or the high pursuit of justice on any score, and such a view of the matter appeals to the presiding officer's file between the parties. There was enough for a re-hearing that would be heard by a special court transfer order for a hearing and decision. However, there will be no defamation on the behavior of the Presiding Officer, whose appeal was withdrawn from the file.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Abbottabad lawyer