Find a Lawyer

SUBEDAR-MAJOR FAZAL KAREEMV versus MST. SURAYYA TABASSUM

Section 151 and 115 Defendants Exhibit / Plaintiffs' Documents / Request for Exhibition of such Documents (Submitted in Proof) The Court rejected the justification when the documents in question were being exhibited while counsel for the defendants existed. And its presence should be considered sufficient representation of the defendants who could not refuse any proceedings of their sel generation in a particular date when the same lawyer was representing them, the defendants had their behavior The evidence did not admit to the receipt of the disputed documents and the defendants could not be allowed ? After three and a half years of receipt and exposition of such documents, objections to the confession of the documents, especially when the case was appropriate for judgment, were, however, mostly documents, copies of judicial orders, of which no doubt. The defendants were not open. However, when examining the evidence in question, there will be freedom to challenge the e-document option if they wish. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer