Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAEEM versus MUHAMMAD HAROON KHAN

Article 212 Appeal for retention of respondent (civil servant) on appeal against the decision of the service tribunal objection, whose termination of service by the service tribunal appellant at the time of the appointment of the respondents. Was declared legal. His termination date was in the service / cadre of which the respondent belonged, but he was serving the appellant in another department; therefore, the service tribunal had the responsibility of restoring the respondent in the service tribunal's submissions. Could not order responding to the question by pointing out that if the appellant was disturbed by the invalid appointment of the respondent (as alleged by the appellant) he could treat it before the appropriate forum, the service tribunal appealed. To file an appeal in the Supreme Court against the order of the court against the order of reinstatement by the service tribunal of the consumer Can't justify. Was not fit in the circumstances pakistani advocates Malakwal lawyer