ASGHAR ALI SHAH versus THE STATE
The testimony of Section 13B of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 was already denied in the other two cases in connection with the arrest of the accused in connection with the rehabilitation and in the present case he contradicted the complainant who was also the investigating officer in the material details. Was. The impression is that he was either not present at the scene of the incident or he was dismissed as a stock witness for the prosecution Saeed Zameer was not a resident of the area of the incident, the counselor was also subjected to suspension. The accused was not hurt by the cause. In the manner presented before the trial court, but it appears that it was due to different circumstances in different places, the accused was acquitted in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Dir lawyer
