SABIR ZAMEER SIDDIQUE versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
Responding to the implementation of the directive of the Supreme Court, 1973 Article 187 (2), the respondents had to be effective in saying that they had the impression that the court was the only decision of the Supreme Court and was not aware of it. Are. Respondents for the second decision had demanded that the instructions contained in the decisions in both cases be rationally approved without delay. After rejecting the application, the applicant was instructed to submit copies of the decisions of the Supreme Court to be implemented. He was searching within a certain time
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Rawalpindi lawyer
