Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD SHAH versus SUPERINTENDING CANAL OFFICER


Canal and Drainage Act 1873 Section 68 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Applicants applied for inclusion of their land for irrigation in which the respondent irrigated their land according to the prohibition by the Divisional Canal Officer. Decision not confirmed. Superintendent Canal Officer Validity Superintendent Canal Officer left on the premises that the command statement attached to the record could not be relied upon by examining the records and the Superintendent Canal Officer himself could have known about the waterway. Had to be given water. May possibly also work at the command, such a search by the Superintendent Canal Officer was completely discretionary in the failure to obtain a record and after the field staff's Superintendent Canal Officer's report took advantage of the relevant record. Was instructed to pass a new order.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Mingora lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.