Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHAH versus SUPERINTENDING CANAL OFFICER


Canal and Drainage Act 1873 Section 68 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Applicants applied for inclusion of their land for irrigation in which the respondent irrigated their land according to the prohibition by the Divisional Canal Officer. Decision not confirmed. Superintendent Canal Officer Validity Superintendent Canal Officer left on the premises that the command statement attached to the record could not be relied upon by examining the records and the Superintendent Canal Officer himself could have known about the waterway. Had to be given water. May possibly also work at the command, such a search by the Superintendent Canal Officer was completely discretionary in the failure to obtain a record and after the field staff's Superintendent Canal Officer's report took advantage of the relevant record. Was instructed to pass a new order.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.