Find a Lawyer

SARDAR MUHAMMAD versus UMAR DIN ALIAS MUHAMMAD DIN

Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R11 Title Court of CPC Plaintiff VII, R 11 Title Court dismissed the Plaintiff's suit to seize the M question of the land through the title court, but the appellate court took notice of the notification to the plaintiff. Rejected, according to which land in which this question was received by the government and the plaintiff had no locus standi to maintain or claim ownership of the place, allegedly taking information as evidence in the appellate state. The appellate court surprised the plaintiff because he had no opportunity to object. Accepting this notification as proof or saying "Notification"! It did not affect its ownership In the case of the defendant it was not that the plaintiff had ceased to own the suit land and did not present the notification at any stage of the order of the appellate court under dismissing the suit filed by the plaintiff. Was set aside, and remand was received for adjudication of the case according to law. advocates from Kala Bagh lawyer