MUHAMMAD SABIR versus STATE
The testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code S 382 was deliberately deferred before the trial court on the date fixed for the declaration of the accused's judgment and was eventually superseded and its appeal was dismissed by the sessions court because of the time. After the prohibition, the accused was not made entitled to the law. Even for any concession or relaxation in the case of delayed concession, otherwise the testimony was independent and reliably impressive and was confirmed by the evidence of recovery and consequently the convict of the accused was convicted. But his sentence had already been reduced to a length of time. For almost a decade he was subjected to a criminal trial and after that time, no useful purpose could be presented to send him to jail: [fugitive sentence]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Kashmore lawyer
