Find a Lawyer

KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus WALI AHMAD KHAN

Code of Conduct 1908 Section 12 (2) When filing a lawsuit filed by the plaintiff for nomination and injunction for rejecting the judgment and injunction on the application of fraud, the defendant with whom the suit was served , While the defendant of this case was constitutional, a written statement was sought to resist it. The petition in the High Court on which the High Court directed the trial court to decide the case within the stipulated period was issued notice of the court motion to the parties and the plaintiff appeared on the date of the hearing but the notice was served permanently. Nevertheless, no one was present before the defendant and the case was adjourned and the next date of hearing, the previous verdict and decree passed against the defendant as no one appeared before the defendant again, later the former party. OX, R, 13, on decree, set aside on the petition filed by the defendant under CPC Oops, but such an order to appeal by the plaintiff which the plaintiff in the previous decision and an order was placed, was allowed to appeal the claimant filed an application under section 12. 2) CPC rejected the earlier ruling and ordered that the plaintiff obtain it from fraud and misrepresentation, but the trial court eventually rejected the defendant's alleged fraud. Failure to prove the fraud and misrepresentation, the trial court rightly dismissed the plaintiff's request. Earlier in the proceedings before the trial court defendants failed to appear before the trial court law firms from Khanewal lawyer