Find a Lawyer

AHMAD NAEEM versus STATE

The accused's father and uncle and two other free and unwanted witnesses were seen in appreciation of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 12 Compensation Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 377, 302 (c) and 201 evidence and The deceased was going together and after that the deceased was never seen alive, and the next day, his body was found guilty by plaintiff, and it was also put on the evidence of the entire trial without oath. Was completely insufficient to meet the burden. The accused committed the crime after abducting the deceased along with him and then strangled the deceased to bury evidence and buried the deceased under the Ordinance S: 12. And under Section 377, the accused was convicted. & ???, the PPC was maintained under the circumstances, it was alleged that he was guilty of murder under Section 2302, PPC should have dealt with the purpose of his sentence under section (b). And its punishment was not under section 2302 (c), PPC was not in accordance with the law, the accused was consequently sentenced to life imprisonment under section 2302 (b), PPC itself After serving the notice, he was sentenced as a businessman. over it how to become a advocate from Rashidabad lawyer