SHARIFAN BIBI versus KAMAL DIN
The Deputy Settlement Commissioner, in both the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1958 Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the claim for the transfer of the house and the claimant's claim to the competitor, found that the defendant had cheated Have acquired two houses. His name was allotted while one of the applicant's claimants was already allotted to the applicant, the applicant received a previous order without executing it that the Settlement Authority question In connection with the house allotment matter cannot be reopened. The Deputy Settlement Commissioner did exactly what the Department required the former party to do because it was not binding on the applicant as it was not implemented, in which case the respondents should not have received arbitrary relief which Due leave of application was required to withhold the request. The appeal was granted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Hub Inds Estate lawyer