MUSHTAQ BAIG versus GENERAL COURT MARTIAL
Civil Procedure Code Order III 111, R4 (2) and (5) of the CPC recognized agents and applicants for dismissing the applicant for illegal prosecution of Art Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 185 (3). The High Court rejected the constitutional application on the basis that the petitioner was absent on the date of the hearing, but was represented by a senior lawyer who should have appeared in the court and No reasonable explanation was offered for his absence. The fact that the cause list was issued and the lawyer had full notice of the date of the hearing, therefore, he was obliged to follow the case even in cases where the client had taken the papers (allegedly) ) It was the duty of the lawyer. To appear at the hearing date until he regains his power or is terminated by the client order pursuant to the rules under the High Court Question, making any illegal, irregular or jurisdictional matter The wish was not met. The leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer